At what point does one person's freedom start costing everyone else theirs?

At what point does one person’s freedom start costing everyone else theirs?

1. Direct harm: your freedom ends where someone else gets hurt or their property gets damaged. Everything short of that is fair game.
2. Limits others’ choices: ends where it shrinks what someone else can do, hurt or not. Loud music, blocking the sidewalk, secondhand smoke.
3. Harms the commons: ends where it damages collective wellbeing: public health, the environment, shared spaces and resources.
4. Wherever society draws it: the line isn’t philosophical, it’s wherever we collectively put it through law and norms.
5. There is no line: freedom is absolute; other people’s discomfort is their problem.

This is not a topic that can easily be narrowed down into some poll answers. So leave a comment to share why you chose what you chose or why you think its none of these options and what you think it is.